Close Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Lifestyle
  • Law
  • Business
  • Education

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

May 9, 2025

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

May 9, 2025

Pennsylvania House Passes Cannabis Legalization Bill

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Saturday, May 10
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn VKontakte
Smoke Professional
  • Home
  • News

    More Than 1,000 Arrested in Sweep of U.K. Weed Grows

    July 8, 2023

    Scotland Calls On UK To End ‘Failed’ Drug War With Decriminalization And Harm Reduction Approach

    July 8, 2023

    Germany’s draft law for first phase of cannabis reform

    July 8, 2023

    High Times Cannabis Cup Illinois: People’s Choice Edition 2023 Kicks Off

    July 8, 2023

    Pennsylvania Committee Advances Expansion to State Medical Cannabis Program

    July 7, 2023
  • Lifestyle

    How Watching the News Can Trigger Anxiety and Panic Attacks

    October 28, 2024

    Record High Cannabis and Hallucinogen Use Among Adults

    October 27, 2024

    Weekend Sleep Catch-Up May Lower Heart Disease Risk by 20%

    October 27, 2024

    Energy Drinks Linked to Poor Sleep Quality and Insomnia

    October 26, 2024

    First Psychedelic Church for Magic Mushrooms

    October 26, 2024
  • Law

    Pennsylvania House Passes Cannabis Legalization Bill

    May 8, 2025

    Nebraska Lawmakers to Reconsider Bill to Implement Voter-Approved Medical Cannabis Law

    May 7, 2025

    Bill to Legalize Adult-Use Cannabis Filed in Pennsylvania

    May 6, 2025

    New Hampshire Senate Blocks Adult-Use Cannabis Legalization Bill

    May 2, 2025

    Cannabis Taxation: C Corp, S Corp, LLC, LLP, Partnership, Nonprofit, or Something Else for Your Cannabis Business?

    April 30, 2025
  • Business

    California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

    May 9, 2025

    California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

    May 9, 2025

    Cannabis Company CEO Considering New Mexico Gubernatorial Bid

    May 8, 2025

    U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Medical Cannabis Advertising Ban

    May 8, 2025

    Minnesota Cannabis Licensing Lotteries Scheduled for June 5

    May 7, 2025
  • Education

    CBD and the Aging Population—What Science Says Today

    March 12, 2025

    Wholesale Nootropic Skincare: Boost Your Product Line

    March 10, 2025

    Ideal for Your Business Needs

    March 8, 2025

    A Must-have For Every Smoke Shop

    March 3, 2025

    The Perfect Addition to Your Product Line

    March 1, 2025
Smoke Professional
You are at:Home»News»How To Save Marijuana Social Equity Programs From The Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Ruling (Op-Ed)
News

How To Save Marijuana Social Equity Programs From The Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Ruling (Op-Ed)

adminBy adminJuly 2, 2023No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

“The solution to saving cannabis social equity programs is thus to concentrate relief to those individuals who were actually arrested, convicted and/or incarcerated (and the immediate families they were separated from), in a completely race-neutral manner.”

By Khurshid Khoja, Greenbridge Corporate Counsel

The U.S. Supreme Court’s move to strike down affirmative action in college admissions on Thursday could have massive consequences for cannabis social equity licensing programs across the country—but there is a solution that can deliver restitution to people harmed by criminalization while also withstanding judicial scrutiny in the wake of the justices’ latest decision.

Some existing social equity programs have already been attacked and even invalidated on the grounds that they violate the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, because most (though not all) federal courts have equated residency in geographic communities that were disproportionately impacted by the War on Drugs with constitutionally prohibited state residency requirements.

Ironically, the concept of “disproportionately impacted areas” (or DIAs) was intended to serve as a proxy for representing the racial composition of those arrested, convicted and incarcerated for cannabis offenses in a specified area. This was true of the very first social equity ordinance because proponents assumed, perhaps wrongly, that California’s Prop. 209 (banning affirmative action in higher education admissions and other limited contexts) would have prevented the explicit use of race in eligibility criteria for social equity licenses.

Some have argued that the appropriate response to these dormant Commerce Clause challenges to social equity licensing programs is to use race explicitly in the crafting of eligibility criteria. They argue that this would eliminate the ability of communities that have not actually been disproportionately impacted by the War on Drugs (for example, white women in the U.S. Virgin Islands) to take advantage of social equity programs.

Would the new majority opinion in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College by Chief Justice John Roberts now foreclose that option? Not necessarily.

The Court made clear that “remediating specific, identified instances of past discrimination that violated the Constitution or a statute” (such as the disproportionate arrest, conviction and incarceration of Black, brown, minority, poor and politically marginalized communities for nonviolent cannabis offenses) would still be deemed “compelling interests that permit resort to race-based government action.” At the same time, the majority also reminded us that “the Court [has] repeatedly held that ameliorating societal discrimination does not constitute a compelling interest that justifies race-based state action.”

That said, the majority’s conclusions also require drug policy reform advocates to rethink eligibility criteria to exclude factors that aren’t “narrowly tailored” to redress concrete and constitutionally-recognizable injuries that were imposed on nonviolent cannabis offenders.

Per a concurring opinion from Justice Brett Kavanaugh in the new case, “racial classifications are constitutionally prohibited unless they are narrowly tailored to further a compelling governmental interest. Narrow tailoring requires courts to examine, among other things, whether a racial classification is ‘necessary’—in other words, whether race-neutral alternatives could adequately achieve the governmental interest.”

The majority concludes that “the Harvard and UNC admissions programs cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause,” because they are not narrowly tailored and “lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race…”

Similarly, the use of broad racial classifications (in the absence of concrete injuries) to determine eligibility for social equity licenses may not be “narrowly tailored” enough even for addressing the disproportionate arrest, conviction and incarceration of Black and brown communities for nonviolent cannabis offenses.

Other federal courts restraining the operation of social equity licensing programs (employing residency in a DIA to determine eligibility) have stressed that such eligibility criteria lack even a “rational relationship” to the goal of redressing individual injuries imposed by the War on Drugs, much less the ability to satisfy the much higher constitutional requirement of “narrow tailoring”—which doesn’t bode well for the use of racial classifications alone to determine eligibility.

As an example, see this excerpt from an opinion in a case on Detroit’s marijuana social equity licensing program:

At a minimum, [Detroit’s social equity licensing] Ordinance must pass rational basis review to be deemed constitutional under both the United States and Michigan constitutions. However, the challenged provisions of the Detroit Ordinance do not appear to be rationally related to the stated purpose of rectifying the harm done to City residents by the War on Drugs. As plaintiff convincingly states in her brief: “If the City were truly worried about equity, the Ordinance would target the individuals who need social equity treatment …. But instead, the Ordinance employs a class-based distinction based on duration of residency. It thus prefers wealthy applicants who have had no interaction with the War on Drugs to low-income applicants who have been ravaged by it, so long as the wealthy applicants have lived in Detroit for the right amount of time.”

The same point could easily be asserted of applicants ​qualified solely on the basis of race, religion or sex—many of whom could qualify as social equity applicants without any experience of law enforcement interaction.

The solution to saving cannabis social equity programs is thus to concentrate relief to those individuals who were actually arrested, convicted and/or incarcerated (and the immediate families they were separated from), in a completely race-neutral manner.

This individualized approach would also acknowledge the history of the cannabis reform movement, rather than arbitrarily excluding some nonviolent cannabis offenders who also paid criminal penalties from receiving social equity relief—for example, white cisgendered male activists from San Francisco’s gay community who birthed the medical cannabis movement in response to the AIDS crisis and federal government neglect.

More to the point, by adopting race-neutral eligibility criteria, we can meaningfully remedy the injuries imposed on Black and brown communities who were disproportionately impacted—and do so in a constitutionally defensible manner that will withstand judicial scrutiny in a post-affirmative action world.

Khurshid Khoja is the founder of Greenbridge Corporate Counsel and chair emeritus of the Board of Directors of the National Cannabis Industry Association. He has co-authored model social equity legislation for the Minority Cannabis Business Association.

Photo elements courtesy of rawpixel and Philip Steffan.

Source link

Action Affirmative Courts Equity Marijuana OpEd Programs Ruling Save Social Supreme
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleFlorida AG Asks Supreme Court to Toss Cannabis Legalization Ballot Question
Next Article From the Archives: Let ‘Em Eat Freedom Fries (2003)
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Medical Cannabis Advertising Ban

May 8, 2025

Alabama Court Ruling Voids Medical Cannabis Licenses

April 23, 2025

Class Action Lawsuit Contends Canopy Growth Made ‘False and Misleading’ Statements About Profit Margins

April 10, 2025

Comments are closed.

Our Picks

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

May 9, 2025

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

May 9, 2025

Pennsylvania House Passes Cannabis Legalization Bill

May 8, 2025

Cannabis Company CEO Considering New Mexico Gubernatorial Bid

May 8, 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Don't Miss
Business

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

By adminMay 9, 20250

The Office of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) announced on Thursday that the state’s ban…

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

May 9, 2025

Pennsylvania House Passes Cannabis Legalization Bill

May 8, 2025

Cannabis Company CEO Considering New Mexico Gubernatorial Bid

May 8, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Smoke Unlimited about Weed & CBD vaping.

From Our Partners
About Us
About Us

Get all the current news stories, latest trends and legislation regarding cannabidiol, products, usages and its benefits. So don’t miss out any buzz and stay tuned! We offer a minute to minute updates regarding Marijuana industry.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Our Picks

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

May 9, 2025

California Governor Touts Results of Intoxicating Hemp Ban

May 9, 2025

Pennsylvania House Passes Cannabis Legalization Bill

May 8, 2025
Sponsors
Copyright © 2025. SmokeProfessional
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.